A confrontation has emerged between residents of Rubindi-Ruhumba Town Council in Mbarara District and the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) over the eviction of individuals from Rubindi wetland.
The dispute arose following a recent restoration exercise conducted by officials from NEMA, the Ministry of Water and Environment, and Mbarara District, which entailed the demolition of houses and destruction of gardens within the Rubindi wetland and its buffer zone.
Expressing dismay over the eviction, Mr. William Mutagwenda, a local businessman, lamented being rendered homeless without prior warning. Having resided in the area for over a decade, Mr. Mutagwenda highlighted the suddenness of the demolition and the dire consequences he now faces, including challenges in providing for his children’s education and potential legal actions from creditors.
Similarly caught off guard, Ms. Christine Aturinda, the head teacher of Spring Junior School, recounted the chaotic scene as enforcers allegedly confiscated phones and vandalized school property without prior notice. The lack of communication regarding the eviction left residents bewildered and aggrieved, exacerbating tensions in the community
In response, Mbarara District Natural Resources Officer, Mr. John Bagambe, clarified that warnings regarding the vacating of the wetland had been issued for the past six months. Asserting the necessity of the eviction, Mr. Bagambe emphasized the importance of allowing wetlands to fulfill their natural functions, which necessitated the removal of structures and activities encroaching upon them.
Supporting this stance, Mbarara District Environment Officer, Ms. Brendah Namara, underscored the significance of Rubindi Wetland as one of the largest wetlands in the district.
Collaborating with the Ministry of Water and Environment, local authorities aimed to restore the wetland by demolishing illegal structures erected within its boundaries. Ms. Namara highlighted ongoing efforts to educate residents on the importance of wetlands, noting a gradual shift in community attitudes towards conservation.
Despite these efforts, the eviction operation has sparked contention, with affected residents decrying the lack of prior notice and the abrupt displacement from their homes and livelihoods.